On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 1:14 PM Tony Garnock-Jones <
tonyg at leastfixedpoint.com> wrote:

> What's missing from this picture is tool support. In particular,
> Monticello support. I'd love to be able to have classes in my
> spliced-into-the-globals environment scanned by MC just like those in
> the toplevel.
>
> I've always found the MC codebase intimidating, however. Would it be
> reasonable to hope to be able to implement support for something like
> this in Monticello?
>

MC relies on PackageInfo to gather information about which definitions are
in a package.

Packages can provide their own PackageInfo subclass, and override the
default behavior.

See e.g. http://squeaksource.com/OMeta.html

- Vanessa -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20210324/1e8ba691/attachment.html>