[squeak-dev] Stream nextPutAll: with an OrderedCollection go boom
David T. Lewis
lewis at mail.msen.com
Wed Mar 31 00:10:22 UTC 2021
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:31:41PM -0700, tim Rowledge wrote:
>
>
> > On 2021-03-30, at 1:05 PM, Levente Uzonyi <leves at caesar.elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > I still agree with my previous answers[1]: don't do that. Just use OrderedCollection's own API if you want to build a collection.
>
> Well, yeah, but.
>
> I like things to be decently uniform and at least try to meet the implicit contract. In this case the problem is purely because the test to do a 'fast hack' wrongly passes.
>
Trying to follow the discussion. Where is the "test to do a 'fast hack'" that wrongly passes?
Dave
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|