[squeak-dev] formatting... (was "The Trunk: Morphic-eem.1784.mcz")
Marcel.Taeumel at hpi.de
Mon Oct 25 06:48:48 UTC 2021
Hi Craig --
We don't have a PrettyPrinter in Trunk that serves our current needs. It's also not only an issue of presentation but also of which format will be persisted, e.g., to cover edge cases in understanding.
Since there are aspects of the underlying program theory in each module not explicable but implicit, we rely on th formatting of each module's main authors at the moment.
From: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> on behalf of Craig Latta <craig at blackpagedigital.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2021 1:24:03 AM
To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Subject: [squeak-dev] formatting... (was "The Trunk: Morphic-eem.1784.mcz")
Marcel writes to Eliot:
> If you want me to follow to the formatting guidelines in Compiler &
> Co., I would appreciate it that you do so in Morphic & Co.
> You changed the entire format of the method, which makes it
> challenging for me to review your fix.
Whoa, is the pretty-printer not configurable enough? Can't each
person automatically see all code formatted the way they like it,
regardless of diffing and storage?
I'd love to make all formatting debates moot, if possible.
Craig Latta :: research computer scientist
Black Page Digital :: Berkeley, California
663137D7940BF5C0AFC :: 1349FB2ADA32C4D5314CE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev