Hi Marcel,

> That's two different approaches conflicting here. I do like the "KernelTests" approach better than that fat "Tests" package.

Yes, same here… all other Kernel related tests are under KernelTests – except the exception tests :) That’s why I wonder if they are under Tests just by accident…

Thanks,
Jaromir

From: Marcel Taeumel<mailto:marcel.taeumel at hpi.de>
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 10:13
To: squeak-dev<mailto:squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Tests-Exceptions package should be KernelTests-Exceptions (?)

Hi Jaromir --

That's two different approaches conflicting here. I do like the "KernelTests" approach better than that fat "Tests" package.

Best,
Marcel

Am 09.06.2022 10:11:42 schrieb Jaromir Matas <mail at jaromir.net>:
Hi,
I wonder whether exceptions tests fit better under KernelTests-Exceptions package rather than under Tests-Exceptions package…?
Thanks
Best
Jaromir

--

Jaromír Matas

mail at jaromir.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20220609/492c8520/attachment-0001.html>