[squeak-dev] Review Request: fix-busyWait-precision.1.cs

Marcel Taeumel marcel.taeumel at hpi.de
Fri May 6 09:15:47 UTC 2022

Hi Christoph --

> [...] there is a real need for busy waiting. :-)

Well, you just want to simulate some work. Yes, using a busyWait implementation is one way of doing it. There are others. At best, you would do some actual domain-specific work for your test. Then it would be a good test. ;-)

Am 05.05.2022 21:26:48 schrieb Thiede, Christoph <christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
This could be good future work. But as described earlier, there is a real need for busy waiting. :-)

Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2022 20:40:38
An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Review Request: fix-busyWait-precision.1.cs
The better solution would be to implement very short duration Delays properly.

Give a man a compliment, he’ll feel good for a day.
Teach a man to fish for compliments and he’ll never feel good enough for the rest of his life.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20220506/3d16b41f/attachment.html>

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list