[squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-cmm.1022.mcz
Marcel Taeumel
marcel.taeumel at hpi.de
Mon Nov 21 08:58:47 UTC 2022
FYI
https://github.com/LinqLover/SimulationStudio#simulationstudio-tools [https://github.com/LinqLover/SimulationStudio#simulationstudio-tools]
Best,
Marcel
Am 21.11.2022 01:11:41 schrieb Thiede, Christoph <christoph.thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
> Interestingly, the in-image Method Finder doesn't find either one.
Simulation Method Finder does. :-)
Best,
Christoph
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 21. November 2022, 00:00
An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-cmm.1022.mcz
You're all 100% right. I had forgotten about #splitBy:, but changing subStrings: certainly didn't feel right. Interestingly, the in-image Method Finder doesn't find either one. Thank you, community! :)
I moved this to Treated.
- Chris
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:23 AM Thiede, Christoph <Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de [mailto:Christoph.Thiede at student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de]> wrote:
Hm ... don't we have #splitBy: for this? This seems like a possibly dangerous breaking change to me. No strong opinion, though. :-)
Best,
Christoph
Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]> im Auftrag von Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com [mailto:asqueaker at gmail.com]>
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. November 2022 06:24:43
An: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org]
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-cmm.1022.mcz
I don't know why subStrings: should behave differently for empty fields as non-empty.
Before this change, empty fields are ignored:
'a:b::d' subStrings: ':' ==> " #('a' 'b' 'd') "
'::::' subStrings: ':' ==> #()
after this change, empty fields are honored:
'a:b::d' subStrings: ':' ==> " #('a' 'b' '' 'd') "
'::::' subStrings: ':' ==> #('' '' '' '')
Thoughts?
- Chris
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:14 PM <commits at source.squeak.org [mailto:commits at source.squeak.org]> wrote:
Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Inbox:
http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-cmm.1022.mcz [http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-cmm.1022.mcz]
==================== Summary ====================
Name: Collections-cmm.1022
Author: cmm
Time: 18 November 2022, 11:14:01.223447 pm
UUID: 9a05d251-4f02-43de-94e8-0f077ec51680
Ancestors: Collections-nice.1021
Allow empty fields when using #subStrings:.
=============== Diff against Collections-nice.1021 ===============
Item was changed:
----- Method: String>>subStrings: (in category 'converting') -----
subStrings: separators
"Answer an array containing the substrings in the receiver separated
by the elements of separators."
| char result sourceStream subString |
- #Collectn.
- "Changed 2000/04/08 For ANSI <readableString> protocol."
(separators isString or:[separators allSatisfy: [:element | element isCharacter]]) ifFalse:
[^ self error: 'separators must be Characters.'].
sourceStream := ReadStream on: self.
result := OrderedCollection new.
subString := String new.
[sourceStream atEnd]
whileFalse:
[char := sourceStream next.
(separators includes: char)
+ ifTrue: [result add: subString copy.
+ subString := String new]
- ifTrue: [subString notEmpty
- ifTrue:
- [result add: subString copy.
- subString := String new]]
ifFalse: [subString := subString , (String with: char)]].
subString notEmpty ifTrue: [result add: subString copy].
^ result asArray!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20221121/3323d878/attachment.html>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|