Hello again,

In reference to my previous query, when did it become fashionable to have method category (protocol) names that signified the package?  How does this help in navigating the system?

It’s quite confusing when I go to a system class in the browser and see a list of protocols like this,



Isn't there a field in the method header where we could store this, and still use the simpler standard list of protocols to assist in learning the system?  Remember, the first rule of reuse is, “if you can’t find it, you can’t reuse it.” 

stp

--------

Stephen Travis Pope    Ojai, California, USA
    
     http://HeavenEverywhere.com
     http://FASTLabInc.com
     https://vimeo.com/user19434036/videos
     http://heaveneverywhere.com/Reflections



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20230101/b7040d7e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: protocols.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 122362 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20230101/b7040d7e/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pastedGraphic.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 2442 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20230101/b7040d7e/attachment-0001.tiff>