<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 16, 2008 10:15 AM, tim Rowledge <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>On 15-Jan-08, at 12:39 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:<br>> Is it possible for Squeak to be considered an "Apache base with MIT<br>> extensions"? The base (Squeak 1.1 ) is obviously Apache licensed,
<br>> and if you made a massive changeset of all changes since then, that<br>> changeset would be MIT licensed,<br></div>Nope, I don't think so. Aside from a number of people with changes in<br>there that haven't yet signed the relicensing paperwork, there are
<br>large chunks that (probably) belong to Disney and HP. Bloody lawyers<br>and big corporations...<br></blockquote></div><br><br>How do I pick out the changes made at Disney so that I can rewrite them under MIT?<br><br>Gulik.
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br><a href="http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg">http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg</a><br><a href="http://gulik.pbwiki.com/">http://gulik.pbwiki.com/</a>