[Squeakfoundation]re: Flow integration
goran.hultgren@bluefish.se
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:28:21 +0100
Craig Latta <craig.latta@netjam.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Göran--
>
> > Or am I missing something?
>
> Well, having done refactorings of this magnitude several times before,
> and having tried "both ways", I think that what I suggest would take a
> lot less time and energy, yielding better quality.
Ok, I have too many things in the air right now, but IIRC you
essentially want Flow to enter the base image as a big "refactoring",
right?
Why is that better than letting it be a package that people can depend
on if they like?
Some reasonable people may consider Flow to be much more than a
"refactoring".
regards, Göran