LogEngine / Re: [Squeakfoundation]Ideas for 3.7

[Daniel Vainsencher]

Maybe I'm missing something, but let me ask the obvious question - Why
should it be in the image?

I think that to get included in the image, something has to provide
either compelling user functionality that we don't have, or it should
simplify the image by replacing more code than it takes. What,
specifically, in the image requires it?

Daniel "Bad Guy" Vainsencher

goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > Hi daniel
> > 
> > I do not know the quality of the package, but I would really to have a 
> 
> I will glance over it. And yes, "Minimal" as a category makes no sense
> since no packages will be in there. :-) I will start by creating "Full"
> and "Basic".
> 
> regards, Göran
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation