[Squeakfoundation]Network stuff

[Daniel Vainsencher]

Darn, I intended to answer this topic on this thread, but already wrote
it in the other. In short, I'm for it.

Anyone objects?

Daniel

Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> It just so happens that I got (once more) bitten by some of the more ugly
> parts of the current networking code and it just so happens that (once more)
> Mike's Network rewrite
> (http://map2.squeakfoundation.org/sm/package/030feb79-34a9-4822-9a6f-d7d2e83
> a0cef) fixes exactly the issues I was struggling with. I don't know if
> that's up on anyone's sleeve but I would really like to see this stuff
> getting into Squeak, mostly because it means that for the stuff I'm doing I
> know I can rely on proper network behavior without changing its fundamental
> semantics.
> 
> What are your current thoughts on this issue? The network rewrite has been
> around for a while now and leaving it at SqueakMap probably means it'll rot
> and die there with anyone having similar problems at hand reinventing the
> solutions he's already bundled up.
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation