[UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet
Gary Chambers
gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com
Thu Sep 6 17:39:56 UTC 2007
Fair. I can understand that distinction, though in Squeak I apply those as
extensions to the model objects (at the moment).
-----Original Message-----
From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Jason Johnson
Sent: 06 September 2007 6:31 pm
To: Squeak's User Interface
Subject: Re: [UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet
On 9/6/07, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com> wrote:
> I find a simple MI (Model-Interactor) sufficient to be fair. The
> chances of actually reusing controller code independently of current
> usability expectations is small...
That's why I say MVP, not MVC. The P stands for presenter, the controller
is just part of the View (as it should be imo). The presenter is just a
basic description of how to present the domain/model objects, sort of like
Magritte. It is also where all the "glue" code goes so that the Model and
View can be more clean. At least as I understand it.
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
More information about the UI
mailing list