[UI] ToolBuilder

[Matthew Fulmer]

On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 05:39:08PM -0700, tim Rowledge wrote:
> 
> On 8-Sep-07, at 3:46 PM, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> 
> >
> >The only reason I might want code generation is to retain
> >compatability with squeak's limited fileout capabilities. I
> >would much rather just have the morph and leave it at that.\
> Limited? Since you can dump any object to a file (hmm, are there any  
> problems with recursively structured object? I've never stumbled  
> across any) I'm not sure I can agree with that. Using ImageSegments  
> can be a very fast way of loading complex structures.

I didn't know you could dump arbitrary objects to files. Thanks
for mentioning that. I see Object>>saveOnFile now

However, by fileout, I really meant "snapshot in a Monticello
repository". I can easily snapshot and version code, but not
anything else using the supported tools that I know of.

-- 
Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
Help improve Squeak Documentation: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/808