[UI] A small change... for a start

[Gary Chambers]

Well, to my mind there is no need for fillstyle type testing in a properly refactored Morphic. There is with what we currently have. (Will post again with a more comprehensive outlook on things).

----- Original message -----
From: Igor Stasenko  <siguctua at gmail.com>
To: Squeak's User Interface  <ui at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Sun, 23 Mar 2008, 03:36:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [UI] A small change... for a start
On 23/03/2008, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com> wrote:
> But the fillstyle is only now aware of the canvas, not the morph (was neither before).
>

Yes, it's not and shouldn't be.
As far a morph provides a coordinates of areas to fill, only the
fillstyle can choose how to fill them.
An isXXXFill patterns is really shows that parts of fillstyle behavior
are handled by external entities, which adds complexity and
uncertainty to many places in code.

>  Agree with you on relative vs absolute coordinates though.
>
>  TC. Gary.
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui