[Squeak-VMdev] GC improvements

Tim Rowledge tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Sat Apr 23 00:47:34 UTC 2005

In message <426987D4.80302 at gmx.de>
          Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:

> > I just verified it and like I suspected, the performance hit has 
> > absolutely nothing to do with the GC changes. We lost a decent amount of 
> > speed somewhere - anyone having ideas?
> All right, found it. The gnuifier still matched against "int 
> interpret()" where it has to match against "sqInt interpret()" now. All 
> of you guys using awk-style gnuification might want to check that it's 
> doing the right thing.
Excellent news for those platforms using gnuifier. It's constantly amazing how
delicate performance is.

Now if only I can get my timing subsystem working properly so I can find out
where the issue is on my machine. :-(

Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
"My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my parent process. Prepare to vi!"

More information about the Vm-dev mailing list