64 bit cleanup completion?

tim Rowledge tim at rowledge.org
Wed May 3 00:37:43 UTC 2006

On 27-Apr-06, at 1:03 AM, Ian Piumarta wrote:

> He also reminded me that I'd been wanting to generalise the code  
> generation such that the choice of image word size could be made at  
> C compile time, rather than when translating the sources.  (The  
> various constants appearing by value and that are currently set  
> depending on the word size would instead appear by name in the  
> code, and the build environment would be responsible for switching  
> between 32- or 64-bit definitions for them.)  This would allow  
> identical sources to generate all 4 permutations of image width and  
> hardware pointer width.
This would be very helpful I suspect. Do you
a) have time to make those changes yourself, or
b) have particular ideas on what to do about them if bar-a.

tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
There's a guy works down the fish shop swears he's elvish...

More information about the Vm-dev mailing list