[Vm-dev] Re: Efficient thread-local shared variables
Klaus D. Witzel
klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Tue Oct 24 08:10:55 UTC 2006
on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:39:31 +0200, you wrote:
> Hi Klaus and Andreas
> I find the local shared variable feature most useful.
> I'am trying to understand your suggestions,
> - have a single SharedPool with values being an array, and an index per
No, one Array per process and one integer index per shared variable.
> pseudo code for PerProcessThing:
> PerProcessThing localSharedValue
> where localSharedValue is (^self at: Processor activeProcess
No, Association subclass #LocalSharedVariable and then
"this is what the primitive does faster:"
^ Processor activeProcess scope localSharedArray at: value
LocalSharedVariable's key is the same as the key in the PerProcessThing
association (for convenience), and LocalSharedVariable's value is the
integer index into the localSharedArray.
If you spend a primitive implementation and suppose that the example
pushLiteralVariable: (#PerProcessThing -> aLocalSharedVariable)
send: #localSharedValue "handled by primitive 4711"
So exactly two bytecodes (without context switch) and, since you at least
need to tell a "descriptor" and what you want from it (get or set a
value), this identifies the least number of bytecodes necessary.
> - have to reset all the shared value arrays each time a process is
> created or die...
This is independent of any proposal, you always have to allocate the
shared value array per process, like in
self doTheJob] ensure:
[self destroySharedValueArray]] fork
> I am not sure i understood well Klaus proposition
> Did i get it ?
I think so :)
> Le Mardi 24 Octobre 2006 07:33, Klaus D. Witzel a écrit :
>> Hi Andreas,
>> on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:46:26 +0200, you wrote:
>> > Folks -
>> > For a variety of reasons I am in dire need of the ability to vector
>> > shared variables (globals, class vars and pool vars) through an extra
>> > indirection vector per process (really per island but binding per
>> > process seems to be simpler for now). Since I need this for *each and
>> > every shared variable* it needs to be *very* efficient.
>> > The question is: What is the most efficient way to implement such a
>> > scheme?
>> The fastest indirect access is through literal variables (limited only
>> the # of literals allowed per method).
>> Since you are willing to spend a #symbol per variable, formally declare
>> "descriptor" to be a class var (or use a pool). Take #PerProcessThing as
>> as example; initialize PerProcessThing to a subinstance of Association
>> which holds a fast and fixed Array index.
>> Then all you need in the scope of activeProcess is a shared Array which
>> indexed by the above machinery. Example use:
>> PerProcessThing localSharedValue
>> PerProcessThing localSharedValue: somethingElse
>> Not counting "Processor activeProcess scope", the above is the fastest
>> double-indirect access that I can think of.
> iFRANCE, exprimez-vous !
More information about the Vm-dev