[Vm-dev] Integration of the BlockClolsure>>value primitive
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Fri Jul 27 18:45:58 UTC 2007
While I agree with both of your comments neither should stop us from
looking at the code to see if it looks reasonable.
John M McIntosh wrote:
> I've always thought that part of the process of providing full closure
> should be some smalltalk code to run
> on existing images where it looks for code that could be affected by
> moving to full closure. The problem with
> providing the primitives is that you don't know within your close base
> if you are abusing non-full closure
> in interesting ways which will now break your application subtle ways.
> On Jul 27, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> Could you please post your changes for review first?
>> - Andreas
>> Mathieu Suen wrote:
>>> The last week I have made a primitive for BlockClosure>>#value and
>>> BlockClosure is the object that behave like the BlockCoontext except
>>> it provide full closure.
>>> So I would like to integrate my changes inside VMMake.
>>> For the time being I use primitive 576 and 577.
>>> Can you add my changes into the main stream of VMMaker?
> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
More information about the Vm-dev