siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 22:01:27 UTC 2009
2009/9/2 Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>:
> On 02.09.2009, at 23:38, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>> 2009/9/2 David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>:
>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:43:19PM -0700, Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>> Is it possible to have VMMaker create a vmmaker.h file that one can
>>>> include to determine the VMMaker version the VM was generated from? It
>>>> would be enough if it says, e.g.,
>>>> #define VMMAKER_VERSION "3.11.3"
>> i think, it would be much better to have:
>> #define VMMAKER_VERSION "VMMaker-dtl.138"
>> and also, maybe:
>> #define VMMAKER_DATESTAMP "3 Sep 2009 10:05 pm"
> That could be in addition to the actual version. But a release numbering
> scheme makes much more sense. Glad Dave introduced it.
oh, it looks like i missed something,
but hey, what is the reason to introduce the numbering, while we
already having a numbering
scheme which going straight from MC?
I think its a most easiest way for anyone to tell: i have a VM , based
instead of X.Y.Z
so, you can quickly determine where you should look at and try to fix it ,
instead of "converting" a numeric version to corresponding MC package.
As to me it looks like an unnecessary brain muscles excersise :)
> - Bert -
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Vm-dev