[Vm-dev] [OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

[Eliot Miranda]

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Co is for co-exist ?  and not for cog ?
>

Because it coexists with the JIT.  Actually it's a co-dependency
relationship; the JIT and it's generated code can't do without the
CoInterpreter.

b.
e.


>
> thanks
>
> mariano
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20101210/4c1788d1/attachment.htm