[Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker-oscog.52.mcz

[Eliot Miranda]

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:

>
> Am 2011-03-20 um 19:09 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
>
> > -------
> > Name: VMMaker-oscog.52
> > Author: IgorStasenko
> > Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am
> > UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4
> > Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50,
> > VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
> >
> > Merge with oscog-49-51 &  Esteban-50
> > -------
> >
> > I feel like you continuously ignoring my requests to merge the code
> > base.. and work together on merged instance
> > of VMMaker.
> > If you don't like this code, just say it. But don't ignore.
> >
> > Its not intentional.  It's simply a matter of finding time to do the
> merge.  Mariano posted a bug.  I fixed just that bug and published.  I'm not
> dissing you.  I have very limited time.
> >
>
> Hmm, wouldn't applying the “default” naming scheme prevent such overwrites?
>
> That is, now there would be
>        VMMaker-oscog-eem.52
> for Elliots version and
>        VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.52
> for Igors version.
> What would prevent us from that?
>

I don't see a naming conflict.  I've been using VMMaker-oscog.NN since the
beginning and Igor has been using  VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.NN.  This
isn't about names, it's about content.  Igor is miffed I didn't merge in
some changes he made when I published VMMaker-oscog.52, right Igor?

best
Eliot

>
> So Long,
>         -Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20110320/49a0c9c0/attachment.htm