FFI syntax (was: Re: [Vm-dev] Re: testing MT and reentrant)

Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Thu Mar 24 20:45:14 UTC 2011


On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> >> Isn't it the best time to migrate the syntax of FFI calls to Pragmas? I
> know it takes some time to implement the pragma support, but IIRC Lukas did
> that a few years ago, so dusting it off and adding support for threaded
> calls (which I didn't see yet) shouldn't be that hard.
> >
> > SPunds good.  Got any URLs?  Lukas, got any code?
>
> Sorry, I don't have that code anymore. I used the existing FFI parser
> code within a string literal in the pragma.
>

So what do you think of the literal array hack.  And remember, this is
for <goog_1321969675>
*posterity <goog_1321969675>* so  <goog_1321969675>*be honest<goog_1321969675>
*. <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/quotes>


>
> Lukas
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20110324/32504ff9/attachment.htm


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list