[Vm-dev] Issue 112 in cog: Literal > 16rFFFFFFFF should better be generated as unsigned long long

cog at googlecode.com cog at googlecode.com
Sat Dec 29 22:12:12 UTC 2012


Status: Accepted
Owner: nicolas.... at gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High

New issue 112 by nicolas.... at gmail.com: Literal > 16rFFFFFFFF should better  
be generated as unsigned long long
http://code.google.com/p/cog/issues/detail?id=112

This was one change of issue 92 which was forgotten.

Currently, gcc is kind enough to correct 0xffffffffffffffffUL by itself,  
but it issues a warning and that stinks like Undefined Behaviour.

Find attached correction based on .oscog-emm.241



More information about the Vm-dev mailing list