[Vm-dev] Re: Issue 112 in cog: Literal > 16rFFFFFFFF should better be generated as unsigned long long

[cog at googlecode.com]

Comment #1 on issue 112 by nicolas.... at gmail.com: Literal > 16rFFFFFFFF  
should better be generated as unsigned long long
http://code.google.com/p/cog/issues/detail?id=112

Please integrate before it rots.
Note that if unsigned long has 64 bits, the ULL suffix is unecessary, but  
it won't arm.

Attachments:
	CogIssue112_unsigned_long_long_suffix.st  1.4 KB