[Vm-dev] [squeak-dev] new Cog VMs available

[Chris Muller]

I thought the "sequence number" (for lack of a better term), e.g.,
2714, was what made the names  unique.  If not, is it still needed
too?

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 07.04.2013 um 01:30 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Chris Muller <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Woo hoo!  Thanks Eliot!
>> >
>> > Quick question, I see you're using a new naming convention, what does
>> > 13.13 mean?
>> >
>> > It means the 13th week of 2013.  So all the archives are named archive-WEEK.YEAR.SVNID.ext.
>> >
>> > Hope that's not too inconvenient.  But they need unique names.  I stupidly overwrite a set of old files doing some reorganization a few weeks back and that wouldn't have happened with unique names...
>> >
>>
>> I think this is pretty useful, however, what about
>>
>>         archive-YEAR.WEEK.ID.ext
>>
>> ? That way, the vms are ordered successively :)
>> (as the current one is 13.13.… changing shouldn't be a problem ;))
>
>
> Oops.  It is indeed YEAR.WEEK.ID.  I misspoke.  Here's the command that delivers the tag:
>
> REV=`grep 'SvnRawRevisionString.*Rev:' platforms/Cross/vm/sqSCCSVersion.h \
>         | sed 's/^.*Rev: \([0-9][0-9]*\) $";/\1/'`
> TAG=`date +%g.%U.`$REV
>
>>
>> Best
>>         -Tobias
>>
>
>
>
> --
> best,
> Eliot
>