[Vm-dev] About Smalltalk getSystemAttribute: 1009 [WAS: Re: [Pharo-project] where to report vm crashes? (while running Moose tests)]

[Eliot Miranda]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:43 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> But it would be nice if there was more agreement on the format of
> Smalltalk getSystemAttribute: 1009.  This is a useful attribute and nice if
> it were parsed by the Pharo image code.
>
>
> yes, I agree... maybe something like this:
>
> Pharo|Squeak|Newspeak MAJ.MIN.BUG:Cog|Stack|Interpreter
> MAJ.MIN.BUG:EXTRA-FOR-TASTE
>

What's BUG?  First let's step back.  What info do you currently have in the
Pharo one?

Here's the info in the Cog one:
VM source revision (revision id of root of VM source tree)
VM source repository URL (e.g.
http://www.squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/Cog)
Plugin source revision (revision id of plugins/Cross)
plugins/Cross source repository URL (e.g.
http://squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/trunk/platforms/Cross/plugins)


>
> So, something for pharo would look like:
>
> Pharo 2.0.0:NBCog 1.0.0:git://gitorious.org/~estebanlm/cogvm/cog-osx.git Commit:
> c4036bdcc3ecf22561e40288def79ef39fb91875 Date: 2013-02-28 14:08:38 +0100
> By: Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>
>
> we have a fixed part and a variable part, so everybody can have their own
> special information at the end... I think this would solve our
> identification problems...
>
> what do you think?
>
> Esteban
>
>
>
>


-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20130314/47c8f15b/attachment-0001.htm