[Vm-dev] primitiveDisplayString is not always advancing destX

Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com
Tue Oct 29 21:11:23 UTC 2013


I opened http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7794
Since the Pharo chiism, I don't know where to open a cog issue...


2013/10/24 Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com>

> I tried it and the image did not explode to my face so far...
>
> http://smalltalkhub.com/?_escaped_fragment_=/~nice/NiceVMExperiments/versions/VMMaker.oscog-nice.338#!/~nice/NiceVMExperiments/versions/VMMaker.oscog-nice.338
>
>
> 2013/10/24 tim Rowledge <tim at rowledge.org>
>
>>
>>
>> On 23-10-2013, at 4:31 PM, Nicolas Cellier <
>> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder why there is not a:
>> >
>> >     "store destX back"
>> >     interpreterProxy storeInteger: BBDestXIndex ofObject: bitBltOop
>> withValue: destX.
>> >
>> > at the end of primitiveDisplayString (that is, only in case of success).
>> >
>> > That would properly advance the destX, and would avoid the guard in
>> StrikeFont>>displayString:on:from:to:at:kern:
>> >
>> > Or did I miss something?
>>
>> No, I rather suspect that is simply a bug. Fixing it would probably be of
>> some useful performance benefit too, though it might take a moments
>> head-scratching to be sure about a good safe work-around for fixing the
>> work-around. Some test like aBitBlt destX = aPoint x ifTrue:["old fixup"]
>> ifFalse:[^aBitBlt destX @ aPoint y] would probably be about the thing.
>>
>>
>> tim
>> --
>> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
>> Strange Opcodes: ZZZZZZZZZZZZ: enter sleep mode
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20131029/0b24a2f0/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list