[Vm-dev] Camera sig fault on 64 bits machines.
gettimothy
gettimothy at zoho.com
Thu Apr 10 18:17:55 UTC 2014
David.
I am taking Tim up on his bounty offer. Gotta love a chance to contribute, learn something new and interesting and pay the rent.
I want to get get my webcam working today and I will turn my attention to CMake tomorrow.
cheers
tty.
---- On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:00 -0700 David T. Lewis<lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote ----
>
> A couple of questions...
>
>
> 1. Regarding CMake Isn't Eliot migrating more towards a Gnu style build
> tree from CMake (that is what I have inferred from emails he has addressed
> to Tim R)?
>
See Tim's answer. I would love to see someone get the $1000 prize :-)
>
> 2. If it is going to be Gnu-ified (which I do prefer) would separate build
> trees for 64 bit, 32 bit and 64/32 hybrid build trees make sense for
> simplifying and isolating problematic build issues?
Yes, you will want to use different build directories for this.
> (If I may add, for the SqueakSSL, I reduced the source to the
> minimum to get the unixbuild to compile and run--AsynchFilePlugin \
> B2DPlugin \ BitBltPlugin \FilePlugin \SocketPlugin
> \MiscPrimitivePlugin
> and a very slimmed down source tree that is actually easy to
> understand--see my blog post:
> http://timmydosmalltalk.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/first-take-on-the-minimum-plugins-needed-for-a-functioning-image/)
>
If you are working in VMM trunk, try this:
VMMakerTool minimal
Also, the VMMakerTool makes it easy to regenerate just a specific plugin,
after which you can just run make again in your build directory.
Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20140410/f7bb8934/attachment.htm
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list