[Vm-dev] Camera sig fault on 64 bits machines.

gettimothy gettimothy at zoho.com
Thu Apr 10 18:17:55 UTC 2014


David.



I am taking Tim up on his bounty offer. Gotta love a chance to contribute, learn something new and interesting and pay the rent.




I want to get get my webcam working today and I will turn my attention to CMake tomorrow. 




cheers


tty.

---- On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:14:00 -0700 David T. Lewis<lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote ---- 


 
> 
> A couple of questions... 
> 
> 
> 1. Regarding CMake Isn't Eliot migrating more towards a Gnu style build 
> tree from CMake (that is what I have inferred from emails he has addressed 
> to Tim R)? 
> 
 
See Tim's answer. I would love to see someone get the $1000 prize :-) 
 
> 
> 2. If it is going to be Gnu-ified (which I do prefer) would separate build 
> trees for 64 bit, 32 bit and 64/32 hybrid build trees make sense for 
> simplifying and isolating problematic build issues? 
 
Yes, you will want to use different build directories for this. 
 
> (If I may add, for the SqueakSSL, I reduced the source to the 
> minimum to get the unixbuild to compile and run--AsynchFilePlugin \ 
> B2DPlugin \ BitBltPlugin \FilePlugin \SocketPlugin 
> \MiscPrimitivePlugin 
> and a very slimmed down source tree that is actually easy to 
> understand--see my blog post: 
> http://timmydosmalltalk.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/first-take-on-the-minimum-plugins-needed-for-a-functioning-image/) 
> 
 
If you are working in VMM trunk, try this: 
 
 VMMakerTool minimal 
 
Also, the VMMakerTool makes it easy to regenerate just a specific plugin, 
after which you can just run make again in your build directory. 
 
Dave 
 
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20140410/f7bb8934/attachment.htm


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list