[Vm-dev] GCC version > 4.4

Norbert Hartl norbert at hartl.name
Fri Dec 12 15:38:35 UTC 2014


Yep, than try 4.7 or above. I can't tell exactly which version starts to complain because my linux systems have only 4.4, 4.7 4.8 and 4.9 and I can that 4.7 is not working

Norbert

> Am 12.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com>:
> 
> 
> I’m using 4.6.3 in an ubuntu 12.04 and works fine for me. 
> 
> Esteban
> 
>> On 12 Dec 2014, at 14:22, Norbert Hartl <norbert at hartl.name> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I tried to compile the vm with a newer gcc than 4.4. It didn't work with 4.9 and I tested 4.8 and 4.7 which do not work either. The last one I was successful was 4.4. Trying to compile it gives an error about conflicting types. Looking into brought to the signature of procedures in cogit.c. Here we have something like
>> 
>> static sqInt abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister(AbstractInstruction * self_in_abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister, sqInt reg) NoDbgRegParms;
>> 
>> and the definition is
>> 
>> static sqInt
>> abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister(AbstractInstruction * self_in_abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister, sqInt reg)
>> {
>> 
>> It seems that the NoDbgRegParms is changing the game. So I assume the signatures have to be exactly the same. Putting NoDbgRegParms after the parentheses in the definition does not work. So I changed both to have it in front like
>> 
>> NoDbgRegParms static sqInt abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister(AbstractInstruction * self_in_abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister, sqInt reg);
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> NoDbgRegParms static sqInt
>> abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister(AbstractInstruction * self_in_abstractRegisterForConcreteRegister, sqInt reg)
>> {
>> 
>> and this compiles for me. So two questions:
>> 
>> - am I write with my assumption and is the change a valid solution for the problem
>> - if yes will you change it or should I give it a try. It will take some time for me to figure out where that is exactly in the VMMaker code and I assume that it is a no-brainer for someone developing actively with VMMaker
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> Norbert
> 



More information about the Vm-dev mailing list