[Vm-dev] Some Performance Numbers: Java vs. CogVM vs. SOM
Stefan Marr
smalltalk at stefan-marr.de
Fri Apr 10 12:52:13 UTC 2015
Hi Tim:
Bye the way, I put the Spur image I used here: http://stefan-marr.de/downloads/Benchmarks-Spur-2015-04-06.zip
> On 10 Apr 2015, at 13:53, timfelgentreff <timfelgentreff at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The numbers are normalized against the interpreter VM. Here are the winners
> per benchmark:
Interesting, but, we should really have a talk about how to present data :-P
I can’t make sense out of your raw R output…
If I didn’t do anything wrong, this should be the speedup numbers over the interpreter.
IMHO, this is actually understandable.
RSqueak Cog
Bounce 2,2 6,3
DeltaBlue 2,0 3,4
Fannkuch 3,7 2,1
FieldLoop 16,6 3,8
IntegerLoop 17,5 5,3
Json 0,7 2,5
Mandelbrot 39,0 3,0
NBody 1,4 3,9
Permute 2,2 2,2
Queens 4,4 2,7
Richards 12,4 7,6
Sieve 5,2 1,5
Storage 3,7 2,3
Towers 10,8 3,4
WhileLoop 14,8 4,5
I am a little surprised that Json is so bad.
In RTruffleSOM, which also uses meta-tracing, it’s not slower than the interpreter.
Best regards
Stefan
--
Stefan Marr
INRIA Lille - Nord Europe
http://stefan-marr.de/research/
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list