[Vm-dev] 64bits spur DataStream assumes SmallInteger fit in 32bits
Eliot Miranda
eliot.miranda at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 07:59:01 UTC 2015
Agreed. Keeping compatibility between 32 & 64 bits is v important.
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
> On Oct 31, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> as the title tells,
>
> DataStream>>writeInteger: anInteger
> "PRIVATE -- Write the contents of a SmallInteger."
>
> byteStream nextInt32Put: anInteger "signed!!!!!"
>
> Which strategy do we adopt?
> I suggest using a fake LargeInteger...
>
> objectToStore := (self objectIfBlocked: anObject) objectForDataStream: self.
> objectToStore == anObject ifFalse: [typeID := self typeIDFor: objectToStore].
>
> Of course, we must also care of LargeInteger materialization in 64bits spur.
> I'm going to fix it unless someone has a better idea.
>
> Nicolas
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list