[Vm-dev] Having a specific class for temp vectors
Levente Uzonyi
leves at elte.hu
Sat Nov 21 18:09:52 UTC 2015
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Clément Bera wrote:
> Well the problem is that if you make a temp vector immutable, remote
temp accessing use unchecked temp vector access that mutate the temp
vector even if it is immutable. So basically at:put: would fail on the
temp vector but access though the remote temp bytecode
would still mutate it.
I've misunderstood your original proposal about immutability. You don't
want to let the programmer be able to make a temp vectors immutable, and
that's acceptable.
Levente
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list