[Vm-dev] Having a specific class for temp vectors

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Sat Nov 21 18:09:52 UTC 2015

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Clément Bera wrote:

> Well the problem is that if you make a temp vector immutable, remote 
temp accessing use unchecked temp vector access that mutate the temp 
vector even if it is immutable. So basically at:put: would fail on the 
temp vector but access though the remote temp bytecode
would still mutate it.

I've misunderstood your original proposal about immutability. You don't 
want to let the programmer be able to make a temp vectors immutable, and 
that's acceptable.


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list