[Vm-dev] Where to get Monitor implementation based on primitives?

[Denis Kudriashov]

2016-01-08 14:39 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <btc at openinworld.com>:

> The in-image atomicity of determining whether a signal was actually
> consumed or not during process suspension/termination is awkward.  Its
> seems hard to *really* know for sure it right (but I haven't looked in
> depth into Denis' latest proposals.)
>

I realize that my proposals was wrong because it is based on extra message
send which can be interrupted. So I think about different solution.
Current solution which silently skip ensure block not suitable for case of
ReadWriteLock where there are two semaphores inside same critical method
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20160108/f44fea00/attachment-0001.htm