[Vm-dev] OSProcess fork issue with Debian built VM

Alistair Grant akgrant0710 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 13:04:19 UTC 2017

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:47:49AM +0200, Luke Gorrie wrote:
> On 29 July 2017 at 18:31, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>     The success criterion is that they all succeed.  By extension this implies
>     that the vm doesn't crash.
> Does this mean that the Test Runner should report 100% pass rate? I have never
> seen that even with the stock image+vm from pharo.org. So I have a
> bootstrapping problem if I don't have a baseline that passes the CI test.
> Just now I ran - randomly - a clean Pharo 5.0 image that I have on my Mac and
> the result I see is: 9098 run, 7408 passes, 8 skipped, 81 expected failures, 22
> failures, 587 errors, 0 unexpected passes. If resolving those 22 failures and
> 587 errors is a blocker for running a CI then that is quite an obstacle from my
> perspective.
> are other people really seeing 100% pass rates?

Nope, I don't remember ever seeing a 100% pass rate for the entire test
suite.  (I don't know how this is handled in CI environments)


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list