[Vm-dev] tracking WebAssembly

Ben Coman btc at openinworld.com
Tue Mar 19 08:47:50 UTC 2019


On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 at 02:49, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:13 AM Ben Coman <btc at openinworld.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Found some recent WebAssembly articles that may impact issues previously
>> raised as impediments to Smalltalk-on-WebAssembly.
>> Do these indicate anything useful for the possibility of running
>> Squeak/Pharo on WebAssembly...
>>
>> Calls between JavaScript and WebAssembly are finally fast
>>
>> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/10/calls-between-javascript-and-webassembly-are-finally-fast-%F0%9F%8E%89/
>>
>>
>> WebAssembly architecture for Go
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/131vjr4DH6JFnb-blm_uRdaC0_Nv3OUwjEY5qVCxCup4/preview#
>>
>
> Good to read.  What can you find that discusses the range of stack frame
> formats?  To map the StackInterpreter to WebAssembly conveniently we would
> need there ability to store the current method/closure in each frame.
>

Can you point me to the code where this happens?

And is there a good general description of this that I could refer to if I
was discussing this with someone outside our community?

cheers -ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20190319/71641ec1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list