[Webteam] Documentation page update
Brad Fuller
brad at bradfuller.com
Fri Jun 8 02:06:28 UTC 2007
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:24:51PM -0700, Brad Fuller wrote:
>
>> Matthew Fulmer wrote:
>>
>>> I am considering doing a large overhaul on the documentation
>>> page on wwwtest.squeak.org. I started by fixing the broken links
>>> on the wwwtest site which had already been fixed on the main
>>> page.
>>>
>>>
>> The use of "Documentation" is a bit of a misnomer for this page. It
>> really is a collection of useful ways to search and learn about squeak.
>> Maybe we should think of another title instead of "documentation", as I
>> do think something like this would be good on the main site (and point
>> to the real documentation on the wiki.)
>>
>> Maybe rename to "Resources"?
>> Then provide useful ways to learn about squeak, including pointing to
>> documentation.
>>
>
> I don't really like the name Resources. "Resources" makes me
> think of things that make up a system and keep it going. Kind of
> generic. Either name would work, I guess.
>
I think "Resources" is better than "Documentation".
==
re·source (rē*'*sôrs', -sōrs', -zôrs', -zōrs', rĭ-sôrs*'*, -sōrs*'*,
-zôrs*'*, -zōrs*'*) pronunciation
/n./
1. Something that can be used for support or help: /The local library
is a valuable resource./
2. An available supply that can be drawn on when needed. Often used
in the plural.
3. The ability to deal with a difficult or troublesome situation
effectively; initiative: /a person of resource./
4. Means that can be used to cope with a difficult situation. Often
used in the plural: /needed all my intellectual resources for the
exam./
5.
1. resources The total means available for economic and
political development, such as mineral wealth, labor force,
and armaments.
2. resources The total means available to a company for
increasing production or profit, including plant, labor, and
raw material; assets.
3. Such means considered individually.
===
Maybe someone could come up with a better name.
> Regarding specific parts of the page, Those Google search boxes
> look really weird to me, and I would never think to come use
> them. Would there be a way to put those as drop-down choices on
> some search box at the top of www.squeak.org?
>
I don't know. There already is a "search" link on the top right of the page.
> that is how
> several other sites do it. Or just put a search box up there
> that searches the website, the Swiki, SqueakPeople, the mailing
> lists, and (maybe) the IRC logs.
>
> The doc team should probably move most of those links off the
> website and put them into a bigger, easier list on the Swiki,
> kind of like I did with the tutorial list.
>
Good idea. I bet the google search is better than the swiki search,
though. That one is not too good.
If so, it'd be nice to repoint the wiki search to a page where one could
search using google. Maybe having a list of boxes.
There is also this:
http://google.com/coop/cse?cx=008315932112852043911%3Ayuibfrpnbc0
--
brad fuller
www.bradfuller.com
+1 (408) 799-6124
-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/related
More information about the Webteam
mailing list