[Webteam] Re: Keywords (was Google stats: Top search queries)

[Klaus D. Witzel]

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:57:11 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:

> Guys, please be concrete, come out with a complete line of that  
> keywords, nicely separated with commas ...

NP, that list will be posted soon.

> About global vs. per page keywords, I can add setting for global  
> keywords but when you write per page kewords as well, later prevail.  
> Good idea?

In principle yes but that requires effort for keeping per page lists up to  
date. Let's start with what is easier to realize and perhaps with time  
find evidence for other requirements.

/Klaus

> Janko
>
> Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:28:07 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the  
>>> first page:
>>>
>>> <meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language,  
>>> application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
>>>
>>> So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
>>  Yes, you missed all topics and all projects ;) The above is no good,  
>> by no means, you want to raise out of the existing web keywords noise  
>> around you.
>>  Just put in all the Squeak project names and all the Squeak topic  
>> names, as they are now spreaded accross the site.
>>  And get rid of the noise, application development returns 107,000,000  
>> results and so does web applications. Put in things which makes Squeak  
>> different from that noise (the "application" terms are infered by the  
>> crawlers and engines anyways).
>>
>>> This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not  
>>> site wide but page by page.
>>  I vaguely remember such things can be done by programming a computer  
>> system? at a central routine ;) But having main buzzwords on the main  
>> page is a very good start.
>>  Thank you for taking care Janko, good job & good tool.
>>  /Klaus
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Janko
>>>
>>>
>>> Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>>> 2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel  
>>>> <klaus.witzel at cobss.com>:
>>>>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Top search queries two weeks ago
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again for that info :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current
>>>>> www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list  
>>>>> with #
>>>>> of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
>>>>>
>>>>> - web application developer (6)
>>>>> - web application (20)
>>>>> - programming language (22)
>>>>> - squeak squad (5)
>>>>> - smalltalk (87)
>>>>> - application (18)
>>>>> - programming (14)
>>>>> - squeak (20)
>>>>> - misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put  
>>>>> in the
>>>>> "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and  
>>>>> topics
>>>>> that the Squeak community is concerned with?
>>>>>
>>>> +1 , keywords is a must.
>>>>
>>>>> /Klaus
>>>>>
>>>>> -- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for  
>>>>> it". Albert
>>>>> Einstein
>> ...