David Farber dfarber@numenor.com wrote: [SM Qs] Were answered by the appropriate authority... :-)
BTW, I was doing all of this so I could run the sUnit tests for the Refactoring Browser like you asked me to. I got 92 errors, all of which seem to be due to the fact that I am missing certain .st files--which I assume are the fabled Refactoring Browser test data files.
Ah... yes, thanks, I was going mad why I couldn't reproduce these errors otherwise reasonable people kept getting...
Why don't you package the test data files with the RB code and put it up on SqueakMap as (something like) RB-Development?
I certainly will, as soon as I figure out how to use SM to package files that should be *not* filed in, but just put in the default directory.
Would SAR be useful for this?
Daniel Vainsencher
david
At 05:00 PM 10/26/2002 +0300, you wrote:
The SqueakMap RC2 should show up your Loaders, just install it again, and it will pull in the updated SMLoader too.
I know Goran has included Ned's improvements and added some package state testing methods. Ned's changes are what makes the description pane so much nicer now.
Contents of SML 0.96 over 0.95 -
- Help now includes a link to SMLoader on the Swiki (the content there
is still embryonic, yell if yout think somethings missing. It's at http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2726)
- Fixed an update bug Ned found out (out of date contents when a package
is installed and stops matching the filters).
- Updated to SM RC2
Let Goran and myself know if anything's broken.
Daniel
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran_Hultgren?= goran.hultgren@bluefish.se wrote:
Go Daniel!
Go! :-)
Now I will be offline for the rest of the weekend. Will check that all went smooth in the next hour though.
regards, Gsran
Gsran Hultgren, goran.hultgren@bluefish.se GSM: +46 70 3933950, http://www.bluefish.se "Department of Redundancy department." -- ThinkGeek
-- David Farber dfarber@numenor.com
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 10:05 am, danielv@netvision.net.il wrote:
Why don't you package the test data files with the RB code and put it up on SqueakMap as (something like) RB-Development?
I certainly will, as soon as I figure out how to use SM to package files that should be *not* filed in, but just put in the default directory.
Would SAR be useful for this?
Yes.
Just add them to the zip, and have the preamble or postscript do something like:
self zip extractMember: 'Test1.st'; extractMember: 'Test2.st'.
or
(self zip membersMatching: 'tests/*') do: [ :m | self zip extractMemberWithoutPath: m ].
or something similar (the latter would let you make a pseudo-directory to put the tests in).
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Ned Konz wrote:
Yes.
Just add them to the zip, and have the preamble or postscript do something like:
self zip extractMember: 'Test1.st'; extractMember: 'Test2.st'.
And since the RB uses DVS, this could be done with your SARPackageDumper as well, right?
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 01:41 pm, Avi Bryant wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Ned Konz wrote:
Yes.
Just add them to the zip, and have the preamble or postscript do something like:
self zip extractMember: 'Test1.st'; extractMember: 'Test2.st'.
And since the RB uses DVS, this could be done with your SARPackageDumper as well, right?
Yes, just put the names of the test files in the "additionalFiles" method in the PackageInfo subclass.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Avi Bryant -
danielv＠netvision.net.il -
Ned Konz