Hello,
i need to keep a bunch of CompiledMethods in WeakSet, but i am a bit afraid, that it wont work as i want to, because of CompiledMethod>>= implementation, because a code, which i currently writing doesn't changing a method's bytecode, but changing its trailer instead, and so, this could lead to undesirable effects..
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
Meanwhile, i think i have nothing else, but just use a degenerate WeakIdentityKeyDictionary , with methods in keys and nils in values. :(
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i need to keep a bunch of CompiledMethods in WeakSet, but i am a bit afraid, that it wont work as i want to, because of CompiledMethod>>= implementation, because a code, which i currently writing doesn't changing a method's bytecode, but changing its trailer instead, and so, this could lead to undesirable effects..
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
We can add it to 4.2.
Levente
Meanwhile, i think i have nothing else, but just use a degenerate WeakIdentityKeyDictionary , with methods in keys and nils in values. :(
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
We can add it to 4.2.
Could we add it to 6.1? :-) I always use a WeakIdentityKeyDictionary or another weak dictionary as a replacement and it feels like a workaround ... At least, GNU Smalltalk and Pharo seem to have implemented that. :-)
Best, Christoph
--- Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
On 2010-04-12T00:56:34+02:00, leves@elte.hu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i need to keep a bunch of CompiledMethods in WeakSet, but i am a bit afraid, that it wont work as i want to, because of CompiledMethod>>= implementation, because a code, which i currently writing doesn't changing a method's bytecode, but changing its trailer instead, and so, this could lead to undesirable effects..
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
We can add it to 4.2.
Levente
Meanwhile, i think i have nothing else, but just use a degenerate WeakIdentityKeyDictionary , with methods in keys and nils in values. :(
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
Hi Christoph,
You can probably come up with a general method that creates a Set wrapper around any kind of Dictionary, like Java has it: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/Collections.html#newSetF...
Kind regards, Jakob
Am Sa., 26. Aug. 2023 um 01:01 Uhr schrieb < christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
We can add it to 4.2.
Could we add it to 6.1? :-) I always use a WeakIdentityKeyDictionary or another weak dictionary as a replacement and it feels like a workaround ... At least, GNU Smalltalk and Pharo seem to have implemented that. :-)
Best, Christoph
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
On 2010-04-12T00:56:34+02:00, leves@elte.hu wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hello,
i need to keep a bunch of CompiledMethods in WeakSet, but i am a bit afraid, that it wont work as i want to, because of CompiledMethod>>= implementation, because a code, which i currently writing doesn't changing a method's bytecode, but changing its trailer instead, and so, this could lead to undesirable effects..
If i could have a WeakIdentitySet...
We can add it to 4.2.
Levente
Meanwhile, i think i have nothing else, but just use a degenerate WeakIdentityKeyDictionary , with methods in keys and nils in values. :(
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
christoph.thiede＠student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de -
Igor Stasenko -
Jakob Reschke -
Levente Uzonyi