<quote author="Torsten Bergmann"> Maybe the license should be a required field in Squeaksource for any new project. </quote>
Yes! /And/ *default to MIT.* Even though in this case Andreas chose other-than MIT on purpose, how many projects are not MIT simply because the default is a choice other than "the one most valuable to the community." Let's use this opportunity to improve for the future :)
Sean
Despite the fact every thing I published was MIT, I would not like to be forced to, even by default. I prefer the license to be kept an explicit engagement.
Nicolas
2010/8/30 DeNigris Sean sean@clipperadams.com:
<quote author="Torsten Bergmann"> Maybe the license should be a required field in Squeaksource for any new project. </quote>
Yes! /And/ *default to MIT.* Even though in this case Andreas chose other-than MIT on purpose, how many projects are not MIT simply because the default is a choice other than "the one most valuable to the community." Let's use this opportunity to improve for the future :)
Sean
How about setting a different background colour for all projects that are not MIT licensed.
Yes good idea.
may be we black skulls :)
Stef
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:34 AM, Yanni Chiu wrote:
How about setting a different background colour for all projects that are not MIT licensed.
-- Yanni
Nicolas Cellier wrote:
Despite the fact every thing I published was MIT, I would not like to be forced to, even by default. I prefer the license to be kept an explicit engagement. Nicolas 2010/8/30 DeNigris Sean sean@clipperadams.com:
<quote author="Torsten Bergmann"> Maybe the license should be a required field in Squeaksource for any new project. </quote>
Yes! /And/ *default to MIT.* Even though in this case Andreas chose other-than MIT on purpose, how many projects are not MIT simply because the default is a choice other than "the one most valuable to the community." Let's use this opportunity to improve for the future :)
Sean
On 2010/08/30 21:40, DeNigris Sean wrote:
<quote author="Torsten Bergmann"> Maybe the license should be a required field in Squeaksource for any new project. </quote>
Yes! /And/ *default to MIT.* Even though in this case Andreas chose other-than MIT on purpose, how many projects are not MIT simply because the default is a choice other than "the one most valuable to the community." Let's use this opportunity to improve for the future :)
Where am I not looking, that I can't see WebClient's licence? If I look at http://www.squeaksource.com/SipStack/ for instance I see a Licence title and paragraph.
Perhaps we should always have a Licence paragraph, even if it only says "the author has not chosen a licence" or something.
frank
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org