Hi all,
recently I have created a PR against the FileSystem repository under [1] that migrates the CI from Travis (not working any longer) to state-of-the-art GitHub Actions. Under the PR, Jakob and I had a discussion on who should receive notification emails about CI failures for this repo.
I first intention was only to add interested people to the mail job (that would be me, maybe Jakob, and everyone else who asks). However, we also enter the squeak-dev list there. Or even another mailing list. Do you have any opinions about this? If not, I will go with my initial proposal.
Best, Christoph
[1] https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5
--- Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
Hi , Not overly interested, but I do have a request for some pharo-interop.
Currently "asReference" is implemented against String in protocol "fs-something-something"
To get XMLSaxParser working on some situations, I had to add an asFileReference which is either a duplicate of asReference or a call to.
thx for you time.
t
---- On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:13:37 -0400 christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de wrote ----
Hi all,
recently I have created a PR against the FileSystem repository under [https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5] that migrates the CI from Travis (not working any longer) to state-of-the-art GitHub Actions. Under the PR, Jakob and I had a discussion on who should receive notification emails about CI failures for this repo.
I first intention was only to add interested people to the mail job (that would be me, maybe Jakob, and everyone else who asks). However, we also enter the squeak-dev list there. Or even another mailing list. Do you have any opinions about this? If not, I will go with my initial proposal.
Best, Christoph
[1] https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5
--- Sent from https://github.com/hpi-swa-lab/squeak-inbox-talk
Hi Timothy,
Can you please open an issue in https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/issues for any API incompatibilities you discover? Then at least we will not forget it until next time somebody finds the time to fix things there.
Kind regards, Jakob
Am Mi., 27. Okt. 2021 um 20:41 Uhr schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org:
Hi , Not overly interested, but I do have a request for some pharo-interop.
Currently "asReference" is implemented against String in protocol "fs-something-something" To get XMLSaxParser working on some situations, I had to add an asFileReference which is either a duplicate of asReference or a call to.
thx for you time.
t
---- On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:13:37 -0400 christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de wrote ----
Hi all,
recently I have created a PR against the FileSystem repository under [1] that migrates the CI from Travis (not working any longer) to state-of-the-art GitHub Actions. Under the PR, Jakob and I had a discussion on who should receive notification emails about CI failures for this repo.
I first intention was only to add interested people to the mail job (that would be me, maybe Jakob, and everyone else who asks). However, we also enter the squeak-dev list there. Or even another mailing list. Do you have any opinions about this? If not, I will go with my initial proposal.
Best, Christoph
[1] https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
Done,
Thank you.
---- On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 13:58:44 -0400 Jakob Reschke jakres+squeak@gmail.com wrote ----
Hi Timothy,
Can you please open an issue in https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/issues for any API incompatibilities you discover? Then at least we will not forget it until next time somebody finds the time to fix things there.
Kind regards, Jakob
Am Mi., 27. Okt. 2021 um 20:41 Uhr schrieb gettimothy via Squeak-dev mailto:squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org:
Hi , Not overly interested, but I do have a request for some pharo-interop.
Currently "asReference" is implemented against String in protocol "fs-something-something" To get XMLSaxParser working on some situations, I had to add an asFileReference which is either a duplicate of asReference or a call to.
thx for you time.
t
---- On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:13:37 -0400 mailto:christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de wrote ----
Hi all,
recently I have created a PR against the FileSystem repository under [1] that migrates the CI from Travis (not working any longer) to state-of-the-art GitHub Actions. Under the PR, Jakob and I had a discussion on who should receive notification emails about CI failures for this repo.
I first intention was only to add interested people to the mail job (that would be me, maybe Jakob, and everyone else who asks). However, we also enter the squeak-dev list there. Or even another mailing list. Do you have any opinions about this? If not, I will go with my initial proposal.
Best, Christoph
[1] https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
Changing the subject line because I am taking this off topic.
I would like to mention that FileMan by Mashashi Umezawa is IMHO a nice improvement over the current Squeak and Pharo file system interfaces.
https://github.com/mumez/FileMan https://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6333 https://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5969
The Cuis project has adopted FileMan, and I find the result to be cleaner in design and implementation than either the Squeak or Pharo approaches.
In terms of my own experience, I have spent time getting OSProcess/CommandShell working on both Pharo and Cuis, and I find the FileSystem implementation in Pharo to be different but not much better (actually a bit more platform-dependencies leaking into the image, so arguably not better at all). FileMan in Cuis is also different, but it works well and feels cleaner in design.
I do not want to discourage progress on FileSystem support, because it is very important for compatibility and support of the many worthwhile projects that are being developed in Pharo. But I do want to also call attention to FileMan because I find it to be simpler and cleaner in its basic design approach.
Dave
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:13:37AM +0200, christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de wrote:
Hi all,
recently I have created a PR against the FileSystem repository under [1] that migrates the CI from Travis (not working any longer) to state-of-the-art GitHub Actions. Under the PR, Jakob and I had a discussion on who should receive notification emails about CI failures for this repo.
I first intention was only to add interested people to the mail job (that would be me, maybe Jakob, and everyone else who asks). However, we also enter the squeak-dev list there. Or even another mailing list. Do you have any opinions about this? If not, I will go with my initial proposal.
Best, Christoph
[1] https://github.com/squeak-smalltalk/squeak-filesystem/pull/5
Sent from Squeak Inbox Talk
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org