Hi,
In the [SmaCCToken class>>value:] method the atribut start is initialize with nil. But the sementic of start is a number so dose it not better to initialize with 0?
I have an error when I inpect the following code: (When clicking on 'all inst vars') ------------------------------------------------------- | ir ast | ir _ IRBuilder new numRargs: 1; addTemps: #(self); "pushTemp: #self;" pushLiteral: 3; pushLiteral: 2; send: #+; pushLiteral: 2; send: #*; send: #factorial; returnTop; ir. ast _ IRDecompiler new decompileIR: ir -------------------------------------------------------
(You have to have the NewComiler to test it)
Best regards, Math
On 6/24/06, Mathieu SUEN mathk.sue@gmail.com wrote:
In the [SmaCCToken class>>value:] method the atribut start is initialize with nil. But the sementic of start is a number so dose it not better to initialize with 0?
From what I see in the rest of that class, you're probably correct.
Have you submitted this to Mantis?
--Tom Phoenix
2006/6/24, Tom Phoenix rootbeer@redcat.com:
On 6/24/06, Mathieu SUEN mathk.sue@gmail.com wrote:
In the [SmaCCToken class>>value:] method the atribut start is initialize with nil. But the sementic of start is a number so dose it not better to initialize with 0?
From what I see in the rest of that class, you're probably correct. Have you submitted this to Mantis?
--Tom Phoenix
Not from the time being. Ok I will.
Math
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Mathieu SUEN -
Tom Phoenix