Actually, I think it would require some changes, if only because the process of making a release would need to be automated to the point that it doesn't take too much time. But Doug is more qualified to answer this.

Daniel

Simon Michael simon@joyful.com wrote:

Daniel Vainsencher danielv@netvision.net.il writes:

...

If we have bugs (and we have more than just those handful that were mentioned), the solution isn't to delay the release, it is to have SUnit tests, use them, and keep them green. Think longer term - it's not about making a perfect release - that'll always be a good excuse to delay a little more. It's about having many releases, at quite frequent, predictable intervals, that are getting better and better, and keeping production and development close. That'll give us long term properties that will keep Squeak getting better.

+1, well said.

I've found releasing on the first of every month to be a useful discipline. What changes would be needed to make this practical for squeak, I wonder ? Maybe none.

Thanks for your work, guides. -Simon _______________________________________________ Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation