j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
I don't see why having an image is any different from having a file system. To me, an image is analogous to the bits on your hard drive. It holds a whole operating system. You make changes to you operating system (add applications) be executing installers. That is analogous to filing in changesets into an image. It seems the world excepts these installers as having different licenses. Why can't changesets, or classes, or methods, or packages have different licenses?
Distributing a whole image is analogous to distributing a whole operating system, like RedHat Linux or Microsoft Windows. How do they handle all the different licenses in their distribution? We should do something similar.
Cheers, Anthony
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org