Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction Arguments and temporary variables: result: 'inner' Receiver's instance variables: testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction timeout: nil
The wrong error handler is triggered. VM problem or image problem?
Best regards -Tobias
Is primitive 199 still a marker only? There seems to be no in-image handling of this behavior. Thus, I suspect the comment in BlockClosure >> #on:do: is wrong. Or is the more VM magic involved and the primitive 201 (BlockClosure
#value) walks the stack and looks for "handlerActive == true"?!
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ExceptionTests-Wrong-error-handler-tp4848699p4848715.h... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Tobias,
That test is a feature request. It has been around since 4.3 or so, and is waiting for a volunteer to implement the requested behavior. IIRC there have been attempts to do it, but no one took the time to review the proposed solutions.
Levente
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction Arguments and temporary variables: result: 'inner' Receiver's instance variables: testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction timeout: nil
The wrong error handler is triggered. VM problem or image problem?
Best regards -Tobias
On 08.09.2015, at 10:58, Levente Uzonyi leves@elte.hu wrote:
Hi Tobias,
That test is a feature request. It has been around since 4.3 or so, and is waiting for a volunteer to implement the requested behavior. IIRC there have been attempts to do it, but no one took the time to review the proposed solutions.
So this should be an expected failure then?
Best regards -Tobias
Levente
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:
Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction Arguments and temporary variables: result: 'inner' Receiver's instance variables: testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction timeout: nil
The wrong error handler is triggered. VM problem or image problem?
Best regards -Tobias
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
Off topic, but I prefer Spur (as I prefer Cog). They're just names. No acronymics.
ExceptionTests>>testHandlerFromAction Receiver: ExceptionTests>>#testHandlerFromAction Arguments and temporary variables: result: 'inner' Receiver's instance variables: testSelector: #testHandlerFromAction timeout: nil
The wrong error handler is triggered. VM problem or image problem?
Best regards -Tobias
On 08.09.2015, at 14:35, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
Off topic, but I prefer Spur (as I prefer Cog). They're just names. No acronymics.
Oh sorry. I always get confused with the SPUR jit [1], not content-wise but spelling-wise.
best regards -Tobias
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
On 08.09.2015, at 14:35, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi all
We have a failure (regression?) in ExceptionTests when running on SPUR:
Off topic, but I prefer Spur (as I prefer Cog). They're just names. No
acronymics.
Oh sorry. I always get confused with the SPUR jit [1], not content-wise but spelling-wise.
No problem, but then that's an even better reason to use "Spur", to disambiguate :-).
best regards -Tobias
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Eliot Miranda -
Levente Uzonyi -
marcel.taeumel -
Tobias Pape