"stéphane" == stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch writes:
stéphane> with squeakmap fixed (normally) :)
Will http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9alpha/ be updated soon? I'm having trouble updating past 7029... getting some DNU errors.
uhm. We are in beta now.
http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9beta/
or to avoid the alpha/beta/gamma/release issue in the future just use
which should always point to the directory for the current release status.
Ken
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 09:21 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"stéphane" == stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch writes:
stéphane> with squeakmap fixed (normally) :)
Will http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9alpha/ be updated soon? I'm having trouble updating past 7029... getting some DNU errors.
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize.
/Klaus
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:39:57 +0200, stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch wrote:
with squeakmap fixed (normally) :)
Stef
On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize.
I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere :)?
Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent bugs. And he is right! I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 months ago). Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why we lost history of certain packages. Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two next weeks are bad for me.
Stef
Hi Stef,
on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:48:08 +0200, you wrote:
On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize.
I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere :)?
Yes, it is attached to new bug report
- http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3837
When I filed in the .cs a serious MC/SM error (dunno which one exactly) happend.
Does anybody know what to do with this MC/SM problem? It errs with "Could not find version 'SMLoader-gk.24'. Maybe you need to add a repository?"
What do I have to do? Has anybody more success when loading the tiny little Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs?
Note that it errs after it did many, many times "snapshotting classes, methods, diffing..." (that took minutes).
Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent bugs. And he is right!
NP.
I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 months ago).
Sure, later one always is smarter (same here, called "learning" ;-)
/Klaus
Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why we lost history of certain packages. Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two next weeks are bad for me.
Stef
Oops! When attempting to reproduce with a fresh image, file Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs loaded and Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs reproduced the error.
I'm sorry, Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs looks like it is corrupted.
Stef, can you confirm that Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs works for you (I did SUnit tests before and after, see preamble in the .cs).
/Klaus
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:54:03 +0200, Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com wrote:
Hi Stef,
on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:48:08 +0200, you wrote:
On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize.
I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere :)?
Yes, it is attached to new bug report
When I filed in the .cs a serious MC/SM error (dunno which one exactly) happend.
Does anybody know what to do with this MC/SM problem? It errs with "Could not find version 'SMLoader-gk.24'. Maybe you need to add a repository?"
What do I have to do? Has anybody more success when loading the tiny little Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs?
Note that it errs after it did many, many times "snapshotting classes, methods, diffing..." (that took minutes).
Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent bugs. And he is right!
NP.
I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 months ago).
Sure, later one always is smarter (same here, called "learning" ;-)
/Klaus
Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why we lost history of certain packages. Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two next weeks are bad for me.
Stef
I have to run now (moving tomorrow).
Stef
Oops! When attempting to reproduce with a fresh image, file Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs loaded and Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs reproduced the error.
I'm sorry, Behavior-class-new-kwl.1.cs looks like it is corrupted.
Stef, can you confirm that Behavior-class-new-kwl.2.cs works for you (I did SUnit tests before and after, see preamble in the .cs).
/Klaus
What you should do to help is: take latest image load you cs publish a mcz take the latest image load the mcz because if this is not working then we should really issues a cs and republish a mcz + synced image....
Stef
PS: with these kinds of changes the order is important. So may be this is a problem there.
stéphane ducasse wrote:
On 21 juin 06, at 21:07, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Thank you Stef!
BTW have you made up your mind about Behavior class>>new and put the code (don't tell the newbees ;-) from the class side to where it belongs, to the instance side under Behavior>>initialize.
I think that what you propose is correct. Do you have a cs somewhere :)?
Marcus kicks my ass by saying that we should really only fix urgent bugs. And he is right! I worked a bit on producing faster scripts (I should have done that 10 months ago). Still my time is quite short and I lost lot of time on understanding why we lost history of certain packages. Now this is fixed. I'm looking at condenseChange problems but the two next weeks are bad for me.
Stef
How about:
http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3405
Includes fix for UUID which is the only client I could find which still had problems.
David
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
David Shaffer -
Ken Causey -
Klaus D. Witzel -
merlyn＠stonehenge.com -
stéphane ducasse