Getting double semi as sequencer harvested.
Hi Jason,
If chickens didnt lay eggs from time to time, how would there be any chickens?
Please note that I wrote to Vassili and cced the list. The step I am taking is getting double semi ready for harvesting.
***
Jason Johnson jason.johnson.081 at gmail.com Sun Sep 2 06:36:22 UTC 2007
On 9/2/07, Jerome Peace <peace_the_dreamer at
yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Vassili
It would be great if you looked in on the report
and
wonderful if you followed thru with your initial effort and helped get this ready for harvesting.
Harvesting? To where?
Into a release.
This doesn't need to be in the main image imo.
It probably does. This is a language change. The test (beyond does it work) is whether it gains general acceptance in use.
I have personally decided it will probably improve code reading and clarity. The jawing about it on the list has gone as far as is good for jawing to go and the next step is to get something in shape to commit to the image.
Code and tests.
It's still in experimental stage. Let's see some
concrete proof that
it helps first.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Once it is distributed to everyone if it is deemed harmful it can be reverted.
IMO good steps are 1) to prepare it to be commited to an alpha image. 2) to get it there and see general feedback in use.
Yours in curiosity and service, --Jerome Peace
____________________________________________________________________________________ Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
On 9/2/07, Jerome Peace peace_the_dreamer@yahoo.com wrote:
Getting double semi as sequencer harvested.
Once it is distributed to everyone if it is deemed harmful it can be reverted.
Is this realistic? My impression is that new syntax is like taxes: Everyone says just let us have this new tax for some project and in 3 years it will go away again. But it never seems to.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org