Changes to Trunk (http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html) in the last 24 hours:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2014-October/007357.htm...
Name: KernelTests-dtl.281 Ancestors: KernelTests-nice.280
Fix testCull methods to correspond to current behavior of block closures. Existing test failures were masked by test methods that required recompilation.
Reference squeak-dev:
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 02:35:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Why isn't BlockClosureTest>>testCull failing?
I think that behavior was changed not too long ago (1-2 years maybe). If you decompile the method you'll see that it's actually
self assert: 1 equals: ([:x | x] cull: 1).
It's because Squeak used to return the value of the last argument if the block was empty, but had arguments. The code should be
self assert: nil equals: ([ :x | ] cull: 1).
Levente
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, David T. Lewis wrote:
If we have this: [ :x | ] value: 1 ==> nil
And this: ([ :x | ] cull: 1) ==> nil
But in BlockClosureTest>>testCull, we have this:
self assert: 1 equals: ([ :x | ] cull: 1).
The test passes. How is this possible?
=============================================
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2014-October/007358.htm...
Name: Kernel-nice.882 Ancestors: Kernel-nice.881
No need to query which selector isDoIt, because DoIt methods are not installed anymore in the methodDictionary (for a few years yet).
=============================================
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org