Top search queries two weeks ago
Impressions
The top 20 queries in which your site appeared, and the percentage of the top 20 queries represented by each search.
Traffic
The top 20 queries from which users reached your site, and the percentage of the top 20 queries represented by each click.
Top search queries
# <javascript:queryStatsSort('queries2weeks.sortBy', '0')> % <javascript:queryStatsSort('queries2weeks.sortBy', '1')> Query <javascript:queryStatsSort('queries2weeks.sortBy', '2')> Position <javascript:queryStatsSort('queries2weeks.sortBy', '3')> 1 40% squeak http://google.com/search?q=squeak 2 2 21% smalltalk http://google.com/search?q=smalltalk 5 3 17% small talk http://google.com/search?q=small+talk 6 4 15% cartoon faces http://google.com/search?q=cartoon+faces 28 5 1% squeak smalltalk http://google.com/search?q=squeak+smalltalk 1 6 <1% sqeak http://google.com/search?q=sqeak 3 7 <1% virtual machine download http://google.com/search?q=virtual+machine+download 15 8 <1% squeak vm http://google.com/search?q=squeak+vm 3 9 <1% smalltalk squeak http://google.com/search?q=smalltalk+squeak 1 10 <1% squeak sound http://google.com/search?q=squeak+sound 5 11 <1% squeak download http://google.com/search?q=squeak+download 1 12 <1% squeak etoys http://google.com/search?q=squeak+etoys 3 13 <1% squeak machine http://google.com/search?q=squeak+machine 10 14 <1% small talk ideas http://google.com/search?q=small+talk+ideas 10 15 <1% "small talk" http://google.com/search?q=%22small+talk%22 4 16 <1% cartoon human face http://google.com/search?q=cartoon+human+face 3 17 <1% ????? http://google.com/search?q=%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E3%82%A4%E3%83%BC%E3%82%AF 7 18 <1% balloon3d http://google.com/search?q=balloon3d 2 19 <1% squeak image http://google.com/search?q=squeak+image 8 20 <1% seaside squeak http://google.com/search?q=seaside+squeak 10
Top clicked queries
# <javascript:queryStatsSort('clicks2weeks.sortBy', '0')> % <javascript:queryStatsSort('clicks2weeks.sortBy', '1')> Query <javascript:queryStatsSort('clicks2weeks.sortBy', '2')> Position <javascript:queryStatsSort('clicks2weeks.sortBy', '3')> 1 78% squeak http://google.com/search?q=squeak 1 2 6% smalltalk http://google.com/search?q=smalltalk 4 3 5% squeak smalltalk http://google.com/search?q=squeak+smalltalk 1 4 1% small talk http://google.com/search?q=small+talk 6 5 1% cartoon faces http://google.com/search?q=cartoon+faces 28 6 <1% squeak download http://google.com/search?q=squeak+download 1 7 <1% smalltalk squeak http://google.com/search?q=smalltalk+squeak 1 8 <1% squeak games http://google.com/search?q=squeak+games 2 9 <1% squeak software http://google.com/search?q=squeak+software 2 10 <1% squeek smalltalk http://google.com/search?q=squeek+smalltalk 2 11 <1% smalltalk features http://google.com/search?q=smalltalk+features 3 12 <1% sqeak http://google.com/search?q=sqeak 3 13 <1% squeak programing http://google.com/search?q=squeak+programing 2 14 <1% squeak vm http://google.com/search?q=squeak+vm 3 15 <1% squeak 3d http://google.com/search?q=squeak+3d 4 16 <1% squeak image http://google.com/search?q=squeak+image 8 17 <1% squeak cd http://google.com/search?q=squeak+cd 2 18 <1% squeak features http://google.com/search?q=squeak+features 2 19 <1% squeak education http://google.com/search?q=squeak+education 4 20 <1% scratch squeak http://google.com/search?q=scratch+squeak 5
Hi Janko,
on Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, you wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks for posting :)
I tried to check with an AdWords campaign which I run for www.squeak.org many months ago, to find and report here the keywords which had most impressions, but all that Google currently has for my campaigns is
"We apologize for the inconvenience, but we are unable to process your request at this time. Our engineers have been notified of this problem and will work to resolve it. Please note that using your browser's back button in AdWords can increase the likelihood of errors. If you think this was the cause of your error, please try again without using the back button."
Will try again once Google is back in business ;)
From what I recall, the active ones where
squeak smalltalk smalltalk tutorial squeak tutorial
All the "rest" keywords/combinations (like: platform, development, IDE, multimedia, VM, etc) where occupied by the deep pockets C#, J#, P# etc folks.
Thanks again.
/Klaus
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6) - web application (20) - programming language (22) - squeak squad (5) - smalltalk (87) - application (18) - programming (14) - squeak (20) - misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
/Klaus
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not site wide but page by page.
Best regards Janko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:28:07 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
Yes, you missed all topics and all projects ;) The above is no good, by no means, you want to raise out of the existing web keywords noise around you.
Just put in all the Squeak project names and all the Squeak topic names, as they are now spreaded accross the site.
And get rid of the noise, application development returns 107,000,000 results and so does web applications. Put in things which makes Squeak different from that noise (the "application" terms are infered by the crawlers and engines anyways).
This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not site wide but page by page.
I vaguely remember such things can be done by programming a computer system? at a central routine ;) But having main buzzwords on the main page is a very good start.
Thank you for taking care Janko, good job & good tool.
/Klaus
Best regards Janko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
...
Guys, please be concrete, come out with a complete line of that keywords, nicely separated with commas ...
About global vs. per page keywords, I can add setting for global keywords but when you write per page kewords as well, later prevail. Good idea?
Janko
Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:28:07 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
Yes, you missed all topics and all projects ;) The above is no good, by no means, you want to raise out of the existing web keywords noise around you.
Just put in all the Squeak project names and all the Squeak topic names, as they are now spreaded accross the site.
And get rid of the noise, application development returns 107,000,000 results and so does web applications. Put in things which makes Squeak different from that noise (the "application" terms are infered by the crawlers and engines anyways).
This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not site wide but page by page.
I vaguely remember such things can be done by programming a computer system? at a central routine ;) But having main buzzwords on the main page is a very good start.
Thank you for taking care Janko, good job & good tool.
/Klaus
Best regards Janko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
...
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:57:11 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Guys, please be concrete, come out with a complete line of that keywords, nicely separated with commas ...
NP, that list will be posted soon.
About global vs. per page keywords, I can add setting for global keywords but when you write per page kewords as well, later prevail. Good idea?
In principle yes but that requires effort for keeping per page lists up to date. Let's start with what is easier to realize and perhaps with time find evidence for other requirements.
/Klaus
Janko
Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:28:07 +0100, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
Yes, you missed all topics and all projects ;) The above is no good, by no means, you want to raise out of the existing web keywords noise around you. Just put in all the Squeak project names and all the Squeak topic names, as they are now spreaded accross the site. And get rid of the noise, application development returns 107,000,000 results and so does web applications. Put in things which makes Squeak different from that noise (the "application" terms are infered by the crawlers and engines anyways).
This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not site wide but page by page.
I vaguely remember such things can be done by programming a computer system? at a central routine ;) But having main buzzwords on the main page is a very good start. Thank you for taking care Janko, good job & good tool. /Klaus
Best regards Janko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
...
Here we go, and thanks to Karl and Brad for their suggestions.
'Smalltalk, Slang, Squeak, VM, Plugins, FFI, Image, Sources, Changes, Classes, Objects, Messages, Methods, Closures, Traits, Exupery, Browsers, Compilers, Debuggers, IDE, Monticello, SUnit, Refactoring, BitBlt, OpenGL, Sound, Canvas, Morphs, Tweak, FreeType, Sockets, ChangeSets, Repositories, SqueakMap, SqueakSource, Etoys, SqueakLand, Croquet, Scratch, XO, OLPC, Seaside, Aida, Magma, OODB, Glorp, ORM, Tutorials, Books, Examples, Wiki, Documentation, Projects, Bugs, Animation, Fun, Education, Research, Industry, Robots, Foundation, Community, People, Donations, Mailing Lists, IRC, RSS, Conferences, Jobs, Merchandise, Buttons, T-Shirts, Download, Distributions, Platforms, Installation, Linux, Mac, Windows, Algol, Simula, Lisp, Prolog, Java, Python, Ruby'
Intentionally left out: Application, Development, Web (too noisy IMO). Will check with AdWords how/what is improved by these keywords.
OT: wish you'd trade the "generator" crap for a valuable "powered by" link to your site, since in the world wide web a backlink is worth more than 1000 times an essentially pointless proprietary $FrontPage$ "extension".
Thanks again Janko.
/Klaus
Hi Klaus,
I just added your keywords as global ones to the website. I upgraded Aida with a new setting for the global keywords, which appear in header of every web page on the site. But you can still define your own keywords page by page, which are then added to global ones.
Thanks to you and others helping providing those keywords!
Janko
Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Here we go, and thanks to Karl and Brad for their suggestions.
'Smalltalk, Slang, Squeak, VM, Plugins, FFI, Image, Sources, Changes, Classes, Objects, Messages, Methods, Closures, Traits, Exupery, Browsers, Compilers, Debuggers, IDE, Monticello, SUnit, Refactoring, BitBlt, OpenGL, Sound, Canvas, Morphs, Tweak, FreeType, Sockets, ChangeSets, Repositories, SqueakMap, SqueakSource, Etoys, SqueakLand, Croquet, Scratch, XO, OLPC, Seaside, Aida, Magma, OODB, Glorp, ORM, Tutorials, Books, Examples, Wiki, Documentation, Projects, Bugs, Animation, Fun, Education, Research, Industry, Robots, Foundation, Community, People, Donations, Mailing Lists, IRC, RSS, Conferences, Jobs, Merchandise, Buttons, T-Shirts, Download, Distributions, Platforms, Installation, Linux, Mac, Windows, Algol, Simula, Lisp, Prolog, Java, Python, Ruby'
Intentionally left out: Application, Development, Web (too noisy IMO). Will check with AdWords how/what is improved by these keywords.
OT: wish you'd trade the "generator" crap for a valuable "powered by" link to your site, since in the world wide web a backlink is worth more than 1000 times an essentially pointless proprietary $FrontPage$ "extension".
Thanks again Janko.
/Klaus
--"If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:47:08 +0100, Janko wrote:
Hi Klaus,
I just added your keywords as global ones to the website. I upgraded Aida with a new setting for the global keywords, which appear in header of every web page on the site. But you can still define your own keywords page by page, which are then added to global ones.
O.K. looks nice from here. Now we only have to wait for the crawlers (about 2-6 weeks).
Thanks to you and others helping providing those keywords!
You are welcome.
/Klaus
Janko
Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
Here we go, and thanks to Karl and Brad for their suggestions.
...
Hi list,
meanwhile things have changed quite a bit in the keywords business, www.squeak.org is now no longer a pure web/dev app site ... instead, we seem to have moved into the brake- and squads-constructor/sales business. Here is what Google suggest to bid for pay-per-click:
kirby squeak squad (8), brake pad (49), brake rotor (16), disc brake (9), brake repair (11), brake caliper (9), brake (43), smalltalk (33), squeak (13), Miscellaneous keywords (9)
The #'s in () are their # of suggested words/combinations, did not list them here.
The Smalltalk-related suggestion list seems to have grown (we ar not soo bad ;) also the Squeak-related suggestions are not bad. And alien languages are no longer suggested (did we put a double negator into the keywords by mentioning alien languages ;) ?
I've search the squeak.org site for brake and squad and there are indeed bug+wiki+news pages with these words; nothing much we can do about.
Happy braking and squading everybody :)
/Klaus
Janko Mivšek wrote:
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
Maybe Etoys, Scratch, Sophie ?
Karl
This need to be done to other pages as well, because keywords are not site wide but page by page.
Best regards Janko
Igor Stasenko wrote:
2008/11/21 Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel@cobss.com:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:56:03 +0200, Janko Mivšek wrote:
Top search queries two weeks ago
...
Thanks again for that info :)
I now re-checked with AdWords and asked for analysis of current www.squeak.org, here's Google's mechanically suggested priority list with # of suggested keyword combinations per category in ()'s
- web application developer (6)
- web application (20)
- programming language (22)
- squeak squad (5)
- smalltalk (87)
- application (18)
- programming (14)
- squeak (20)
- misc: small talk, croquet, seaside (5)
Q: is it possible you drop the "generator" meta tag and instead put in the "keywords" and "description" meta tags listing all the projects and topics that the Squeak community is concerned with?
+1 , keywords is a must.
/Klaus
-- "If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it". Albert Einstein
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Karl Ramberg karlramberg@gmail.com wrote:
Janko Mivšek wrote:
Thanks Klaus for this analysis. I added following keywords to the first page:
<meta name="keywords" content="Smalltalk, programming language, application development, Croquet, web applications, Seaside, Aida/Web">
So much for start. Did I miss some imortant keyword?
Maybe Etoys, Scratch, Sophie ?
wouldn't "Squeak" be an important keyword?
also, how about: oop, object oriented programming, virtual machine, vm, alan kay, dan ingalls, esug
and, if this is going to be hidden meta tags on the front page, do we want to take a lesson from Google and place keywords like: java, self
Might get some access from java searchers
webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Brad Fuller -
Igor Stasenko -
Janko Mivšek -
Karl Ramberg -
Klaus D. Witzel