[Newbies] Re: anObject select: #aMethodName -- is this good Squeak?

[Klaus D. Witzel]

On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:15:34 +0100, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 08/02/2007 alle 11.37 +0100, Klaus D. Witzel ha scritto:
>> On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:21:53 +0100, Giovanni Corriga wrote:
>
>> > Does it? I tried browsing for senders on a 3.9 image before sending my
>> > message, and it didn't work.
>>
>> What was that symbol (for reproduction)?
>>
>> FWIW in #thoroughWhichSelectorsReferTo:special:byte: it is sought for
>> #allButLast of the method's literals. This can be a problem if the  
>> method
>> wasn't (re-)created after the image was traitified.
>>
>> Also, SystemNavigation>>#allCallsOn: is influenced by (Preferences
>> thoroughSenders).
>
> Ok, looking for senders from the Method Finder and/or the Message Finder
> works. But clicking on the Senders button on the browser doesn't show
> the symbol with the other selectors.
>
> I tested this by creating a bogus class and adding a method with this:
>
> #(1 2 3) select: #even.
>
> thoroughSenders is set.

I tested: in IntegerTest>>#testEven I added a line at the end
	.
	self assert: (1 perform: #odd)

Now senders of #odd, when selecting 'odd' and doing alt-n, includes the  
changed method.

But the browser's "senders" button apparently is not in sync with the much  
better capabilities of #allCallsOn: and #thoroughSenders. I must say that  
this was the first time ever that I used this particular button ;-)

/Klaus

> 	Giovanni